PDA

View Full Version : My opinion of the Dalton unit.


Jim Koehler
02-19-2000, 03:07 PM
Hi guys,


The Dalton mag is a gradiometer - that is, it is sensitive to the


difference between the two sensors.The Geometrics unit Patrick is


referring to is, I believe, a single magnetometer only. The big


advantage of a gradiometer is that it is not affected by general


changes in the earth's magnetic field due to ionospheric currents.


At low magnetic latitudes, the local magnetic field varies fairly


slowly and not very much. At high magnetic latitudes, you can get


very rapid and very large changes in the magnetic field on the


ground. Up at Churchill, Manitoba, at the rocket range, I have seen


changes in the magnetic field (on the ground) of more than 1000 nT


over a time period of about 5 minutes. Using a single head mag. like


the Geometrics (or any other single sensor mag.), you can't tell if


the change you are seeing is caused by something you're going past


or by the ionospheric currents overhead.


I have seen a Dalton mag. owned by one of my neighbours down here in


Arizona and, in my opinion, it is not worth the money. It is


essentially identical to the gradiometer that Phil Barnes describes


with one small difference. Dalton passes a small DC current through


one of his sensors during the 'readout' phase so that you get a slow


beat even if there is no magnetic material in the vicinity. Changes


in the local magnetic gradient due to nearby magnetic materials then


cause a change in the period of the beat. He calls this method the


"delta-squared' method because he observes this 'change in the


difference' - the difference being due to this small DC current.


This helps but, in my opinion, only slightly. Unless you are going


to invest in a portable chart recorder, it is very difficult to


hear, through earphones, any meaningful change due to small


gradients in the field. I must add the caveat that I've never taken


the Dalton unit apart or looked at the insides. I've just seen the


unit, seen it operating and read the literature he provides. The


unit I saw was built more than three years ago and I have no idea


how much, if any, he has improved it since then.


All things considered, I'd just buy Phil Barnes excellent


construction CD (http://members.aol.com/phil770/index.htm)and build


the Phil Barnes unit. It works, has readily available components


(most of these can be bought at a local Radio Shack outlet), is


simple and inexpensive, and is essentially the same thing as the


Dalton unit. The sensitivity is, as I've described in my overall


document, about 25 nT, give or take. For a gradiometer of this type


where you are listening to the beat, you want the signal to decay


very slowly and hence probably want to use distilled water as the


liquid since it has a decay time constant of ~3 seconds. Kerosene


has a decay time of ~0.5 seconds so wouldn't be usable in this type


of mag. - the signal just fades out too rapidly - you need to


measure the frequency electronically over this short a period.


The 'stand-alone' unit I've described in my most recent addition to


my Web pages can use any liquid and gives a digital readout and has


a resolution of about 0.1 nT. However, it is a single sensor unit,


like the Geometrics, and has the failings of a single sensor unit.


For prospecting on the ground, you probably will want a gradiometer


and that requires two single magnetometer units. I've finished my


gradiometer but am making minor changes in it and am not ready to


release the plans till I'm sure all the i's have been dotted and the


t's crossed.


My 'stand-alone' mag. can probably be built for approx. $100 -


that's the cost of the parts and assuming that the labour, provided


by the builder, is free. The gradiometer requires two of these


units plus an additional few parts. I'd estimate a total cost of


about $300.


Jim


J.A. Koehler


3290 N. Koehler Rd.


Florence, AZ, 85232


Ph: (520) 868-1156