| | Quote: | | | Posted by Goldfinger | | | |
| This may be a silly question but are those sharks teeth considered fossils? The reason I ask is they don't look that old. Now some fossil teeth do qualify as fossils like those from the megalodon. Steve
| |
| | |
Goldfinger,
Yes they are Fossils. These were not for sale for show only!!!!!!!!! It took nearly 20 years of collecting to assemble the collage of teeth he had there. These are (Creto Lammna).
Big teeth don't make it old. Yes, some of them do look like they were shed recently.
I assure you, they are very ancient they came from an upper Cretaceous deposit near the Texas Oklahoma border.
The teeth pictured on this post are about 50 million years older than that of the Charcardon Megaladon, from the Miocene/Eocene epoc.
BTW: I took no pics of Megaladon teeth there were several vendors
that had lots of them for sale value from 15.00 to 400.00.
Out4gold
Linkback: You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login
http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,18970.msg124187.html#msg124187
|
|
Logged
|
Out4gold AKA:Bone2stone
|