[x] Welcome at THunting.com!

A fun place to talk about Metal Detecting, Treasure Hunting & Prospecting. Here you can share finds and experience with thousands of members from all over the world

Join us and Register Now - Its FREE & EASY

THunting.com
Treasure Hunting & Metal Detecting Community
   
Advanced Search
*
Welcome, Guest! Please login or register HERE - It is FREE and easy.
Only registered users can post and view images on our message boards.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with email, password and session length
Or Login Using Social Network Account
2
News:
Pages: 1    Go Down
Print
Share this topic on FacebookShare this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on Twitter
Tags:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offline TarotTopic starter
Pull Tab
*

Join Date: Dec, 2009
Thank you0

Activity
0%
Male
United Kingdom
Posts: 10
Referrals: 0

45.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« on: December 09, 2010, 06:42:19 pm »
Go Up Go Down

Hi Everyone

Here is my report and initial tests of the new Garrett 8.5? x 11? DD PROformance search coil, fitted to the Garrett Ace 250.  Most 250 owners will be using the standard coil, and much of this report is a comparison between that and the new DD coil.

The build quality is very good, and the new coil seems to be a strong design.  It is a good fit onto the lower stem, and there is no drooping or need for any coil support.  When first fitted it looks enormous, compared with the standard coil. But the biggest surprise is the weight, or to be more correct the lack of weight.

6.5? x 9? (No Coil Cover) = 454gms or 16oz

6.5? x 9? (With Coil Cover) = 515gms or 18.2oz

8.5? x 11? (No Coil Cover) = 468gms or 16.05oz

So for all of its extra size, the new coil come in just a fraction heavier than the standard coil.

Below are some pictures of both coils side by side.

{alt}

{alt}

Now onto some air testing of the two coils. I know many of you will not agree with tests done in this way, but they have been done to provide a comparison.

Below are some pictures of the targets used in the test. These include UK and US coins, and some jewelry and junk items.

{alt}

{alt}

{alt}

{alt}

I tried to keep the test between the two coils identical, and as fair as possible. The tests were done on a wooden surface, away from any metals or electrical interference. I ran the targets past the coils at a normal sweep speed, and not whipping them to achieve better results. I only recorded good two way signals. The 250 was set in the All Metal mode, and each coil was tested at sensitivity settings of 4 and 6. It should be noted that the DD coil suffers more from electrical interference than the standard coil.  But I have found this to be a characteristic of all the DD coils I have used in the past.

Below is a table showing the test results.

{alt}

As you can see from the results, the new DD coil performed very well.  At equal sensitivity setting it out performed the standard coil on almost every target. But by design the DD coil should perform better in badly mineralized ground and on salt beaches. So in theory on a wet salt beach where the standard coil could be run at a sensitivity of 4, the DD coil may run at sensitivity 6. If this was the case, the depth improvement could be as much as 30%.

Much of this is just theory, and I hope to get out to the beach very soon, and put it to the test. At least the comparison chart gives you a good example of how the new coil performs, under air test conditions.

I hope some of this information will help other 250 users considering purchasing the new coil.

Kind Regards Tarot.


Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,19900.msg131009.html#msg131009
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/CoilTop-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/CoilBase-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/01-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/02-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/03-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/04-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/CoilChart-L.jpg




Logged

Invenire Et Conservare

Offline trashdigger
Bronze Member
*

Join Date: Oct, 2010
Thank you1

Activity
0%
Posts: 216
Referrals: 0

0.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2010, 06:45:43 pm »
Go Up Go Down

Thats great, I was wanting to know the new weight of the new blunt coil.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,19900.msg131010.html#msg131010




Logged
Offline TarotTopic starter
Pull Tab
*

Join Date: Dec, 2009
Thank you0

Activity
0%
Male
United Kingdom
Posts: 10
Referrals: 0

45.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2010, 05:20:22 pm »
Go Up Go Down

Coil Test Update

Hi Everyone

When I wrote the original report, I did not have the coil cover for the new DD coil.  The covers have just become available, and I can now update the weight comparison (With a surprising result !!).

{alt}

Firstly all of the weights shown in grams are very accurate, but some of the conversions to ounces have been rounded up or down. In the original report the weight of the 8.5? x 11? coil was wrongly converted, and should have read 16.5 oz.

So to clarify the weight comparison, I have relisted the weights below together with the new coil cover data.

6.5? x 9? Coil Cover = 61gms or 2.2oz

8.5? x 11? Coil Cover = 46gms or 1.6oz

As you can see, the 8.5? x 11? coil cover is much lighter than the 6.5? x 9? coil cover.  This has been achieved by having a more open design, and being a much thinner profile.

{alt}

6.5? x 9? (No Coil Cover) = 454gms or 16oz

6.5? x 9? (With Coil Cover) = 515gms or 18.2oz

8.5? x 11? (No Coil Cover) = 468gms or 16.5oz

8.5? x 11? (With Coil Cover) = 514gms or 18.2oz

So the 8.5? x 11? coil + cover is actually 1gm lighter than the 6.5? x 9? coil + cover. (Amazing considering its much larger size)

{alt}

I have still not been able to get out detecting with the new coil, but hope to get out after the holidays.  I will update this thread with the results.


Kind Regards Tarot


Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,19900.msg132145.html#msg132145
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/CC01-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/CC02-L.jpg
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q144/Accrington500/Garrett/CC03-L.jpg




Logged

Invenire Et Conservare

Offline BitburgAggie_7377
Klugheit und Verstandnis
Platin Member
*

Define Treasure
Klugheit und Verstandnis
Join Date: Jul, 2009
Thank you116

Activity
76%

United States
Posts: 9235
Referrals: 0

26045.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards

Fisher Impulse , Tesoro Lobo SuperTraq, Tesoro Vaquero, Tesoro Compadre, Garrett AT Max, Whites Sierra Super Trac
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2010, 09:41:53 pm »
Go Up Go Down

Tarot, thank for the excellent report.  Should be of use to anyone considering a coil upgrade for the 250.

BA

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,19900.msg132176.html#msg132176




Logged
Print
Pages: 1    Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2005, Simple Machines | Sitemap
Copyright THunting.com