Is Chirst buried in Kashmir?

Hey all

One link concerning "Shroud of Turin in the spring of 2010" with news and differents links

>

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

Shroud of Turin

All the best

Luc

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,14026.msg89110.html#msg89110

Hello All

I was under the impression that from the work done by scientists with the sample taken from bottom lower end portion of the Turin Shroud was conclusive that it 12 century in origin. There it could have never been a impression or image of Christ or a crucified man in the first century AD.

And our scientific world claimed the shroud as a fake.

However now I  am not to sure.

An ordinary couple for the mid west united states just like you or me who had an interest in researching the subject. Researched the findings of the Scientific test conducted on the shroud. And found a fatal flaw in what part they obtained the sample.

At first the couple were treated like new age conspiracy theorist by the scientists.

The couples claims were rejected without even looking into them. However one of the original scientists in the project still had a sample left and he checked the couples claims. At first he was astounded that they had made an mistake now so obvious. He conferred with another colleague in Italy who had a sample. The sample confirmed the couples claims.

The results showed that shroud had been damaged many times over the centuries by pilgrims cuting pieces off and by a church fire.

The Area where the sample was taken on the extreme corner of the left hand bottom corner of the should was repaired in the 12th century by Flemish weavers. The weaver wove 12 century fibers into damaged part of shroud. It was only after intensive study by material and fiber experts under microscope the repair work was detected by two type of fibers interwoven exactly where the scientific took the sample 20 years ago.

This left the scientists a little embarrassed that with such a major study was fatally flawed. However scientists discovered some samples of the scrapings of the scorch marks had been stored. New technology was able to carbon date these samples and the results were near the 1st century AD.

Scientists cannot explain the reaction on how the image was made on the cloth. No one can say for definite that it is the actual image of Christ. Whoever the person was he was crucified around the 1st century AD.

I think there is many lessons to be learned here that scientific with all there technology and educated some times do not have all the answers.

Constant re-evaluation is needed in any research.

It is some thing to keep in mind in our own research projects.

Hardluck.   

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,14026.msg89192.html#msg89192

		Quote:			Posted by Idaho Jones
	Very interesting Hardluck. Now we simply open the box take a sample and compare it with the Sudarium of Oveido and the Shroud of Turin blood. Lets have real scientists without an agenda preform the tests, ones professional enough to not rely on a single test as proof positive. Both camps have failed in that regard on multiple occasions. The real question is which fear is stronger that it won't match or that it will? Fascinating stuff

It is an excellent idea you have there. Idaho Jones.

I cannot imagine the ramifications if the results were positive and matched?

Hardluck.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,14026.msg89240.html#msg89240

Hey all

As you know I am working on deciphering the messages of Abb? Sauni?re found by Ben Hammott in different bottles buried in the countryside around Rennes-le-Ch?teau. Out in message number 2, it is written and signed by the hand of the Father as "This simple carpenter, that Jesus Christ was a lie, the resurrection of our Lord ..." and also in the message number three "The true story of the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus did not die on the cross but after 22 days. The removal of Jesus from his tomb was made by Mary Magdalene who lied about the resurrection. Dupe were men. The body of Christ, discovered by the Templars and then hidden three times .....".

On the shroud is impossible that the imprint of the crucified will be reproduced on fabric knowing that the body of the victim alive has been moved and therefore not covered as a funeral rite. For there is an impression, it takes some time for the body of acidic agents can permeate the fabric frames.

I'm sorry for not able to show you the entire text messages on Sauni?re's (these rights belong to Ben Hammott).

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,14026.msg89258.html#msg89258

Hi

Hardluck

This post is another excellent piece of research on your part.

I also researched along this path, i was able to find in some ancient scripts something that did not make sense, for example:

There is written proof that Jesus was crucified and also Jesus body buried in a tomb.

As you have already mentioned Jesus overcome his injuries then moved to India - my research shows this.

Here is something that might disturb some faiths, Jesus is said to have lived in India to the ripe old age of 120 years.

regards

   

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,14026.msg89265.html#msg89265