[x] Welcome at THunting.com!

A fun place to talk about Metal Detecting, Treasure Hunting & Prospecting. Here you can share finds and experience with thousands of members from all over the world

Join us and Register Now - Its FREE & EASY

THunting.com
Treasure Hunting & Metal Detecting Community
   
Advanced Search
*
Welcome, Guest! Please login or register HERE - It is FREE and easy.
Only registered users can post and view images on our message boards.

Login with email, password and session length
Or Login Using Social Network Account
News:
Pages: 1    Go Down
Print
Share this topic on FacebookShare this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on Twitter
Tags:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offline foxyrickTopic starter
Pull Tab
*

Join Date: Aug, 2009
Thank you0

Activity
0%
Male
United Kingdom
Posts: 24
Referrals: 0

105.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« on: August 18, 2009, 02:55:27 pm »
Go Up Go Down

I've spent most of today reading a lot of the information here and elsewhere on assorted PI designs. Some of them mention distances at which a gold ring might be detected. What about smaller gold or silver jewelery though, say small earrings?

I'm interested in beach and lakeside hunting, including getting into the water.

Edit: I should probably add that I would want to find the small stuff at useful depths as well; say 8-12" Huh?. No point detecting on nice, soft sand if I don't get the opportunity to dig some nice holes!

Having read most of the designs, I'm still not sure which deign is best for getting the smaller stuff as well as larger items.

I understand that coil size is one of the determining factors but obviously don't want to have to end up with a tiny coil when I could have built a different circuit and used a bigger one.

I think I've got the principle of how PI detection works and how eddy currents decay differently depending on the target's conductivity. Am I correct that smaller pieces (or deeper pieces) of the same metal just give a smaller signal, so I'm looking for a sensitive detection, or does the signal decay quicker as well?

I've got a good selection of electronics kit here, although I haven't used it in a few years, so I'm not concerned about the complexity of the designs. Can even program PIC's (got a drawer full) if required. I was even thinking about designing my own timing control in an Altera CPLD... but that's probably best left for a future exercise.

So, any suggestions as to which would be the best one for me to look at?

Cheers,
Rick.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg44609.html#msg44609




« Last Edit: August 18, 2009, 03:07:30 pm by foxyrick »
Logged
Offline Eugene52
M.D. Electronic Builders Club
Global Moderator
Gold Member
*****

M.D. Electronic Builders Club
Join Date: Dec, 2008
Thank you2

Activity
11%
Male
United States
Posts: 2242
Referrals: 0

15326.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards

Whites Mxt Pro
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2009, 03:22:05 pm »
Go Up Go Down

Quote:Posted by foxyrick
I've spent most of today reading a lot of the information here and elsewhere on assorted PI designs. Some of them mention distances at which a gold ring might be detected. What about smaller gold or silver jewelery though, say small earrings?

I'm interested in beach and lakeside hunting, including getting into the water.

Edit: I should probably add that I would want to find the small stuff at useful depths as well; say 8-12" pr more???. No point detecting on nice, soft sand if I don't get the opportunity to dig some nice holes!

Having read most of the designs, I'm still not sure which deign is best for getting the smaller stuff as well as larger items.

I understand that coil size is one of the determining factors but obviously don't want to have to end up with a tiny coil when I could have built a different circuit and used a bigger one.

I think I've got the principle of how PI detection works and how eddy currents decay differently depending on the target's conductivity. Am I correct that smaller pieces (or deeper pieces) of the same metal just give a smaller signal, so I'm looking for a sensitive detection, or does the signal decay quicker as well?

I've got a good selection of electronics kit here, although I haven't used it in a few years, so I'm not concerned about the complexity of the designs. Can even program PIC's (got a drawer full) if required. I was even thinking about designing my own timing control in an Altera CPLD... but that's probably best left for a future exercise.

So, any suggestions as to which would be the best one for me to look at?

Cheers,
Rick.


Hello Rick . Probably the best PI machine for small Gold will be the new modified Goldscan IV that some forum members here are working on right now . I do not know if very small gold nuggets or flakes is possible at 8-12 inches  , but the Goldscan IV might be your best choice for larger gold nuggets/rings at the 8-12 inch depth you need . I know the mods were done in 2005 by a really smart Technician , but no final field tests or updated schematics were ever posted that I could find . I think for Gold this would be a great project to build and test . Others are welcome to post more opinions here , please !!
HH....... Great......Eugene

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg44613.html#msg44613




Logged
Offline goldigger
Silver Member
*

Join Date: Jun, 2009
Thank you0

Activity
0%
Male
Canada
Posts: 1126
Referrals: 0

5405.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards

Bounty  Hunter and several more.
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2009, 05:29:16 pm »
Go Up Go Down

Eugene52;

I am staying out of the argum..... er..... discussion, until I can do some experimenting of my own, on a couple ideas I have.... I dont need to be confused, right now.  Funny

goldigger

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg45704.html#msg45704




Logged

goldigger

Online homefire
Mod
Platin Member
*****

Join Date: Jan, 2009
Thank you2

Activity
100%
Male
United States
Posts: 11452
Referrals: 0

33339.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2009, 06:22:59 pm »
Go Up Go Down

When  you hear of Conductivity, they are not talking about electrical but Magnetic Conductivity.

Gold is sorta poor at That.

For a PI detector to see Gold, it has to sample the returned values at less then 10uS after the event or Transmitted Magnetic Pulse to set up the Ringing Edy currents being looks for.

I'm working on a old Garrett Sea hunter XL500 that can do this I think!

VLF detectors have similar problems detecting gold because Gold lacks the PHASE change that other materials can produce.  Nickel , is not Really  Magnetically Conductive but would hide Gold.

Gold seems to have even Less!

This image was taken from another Forum and was originally in German.

It shows the Response of various targets with a PI.

Note the Response time or Returned Signals on the Targets.


Gold is the least of the Bunch.





Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg45725.html#msg45725



There are 1 attachment(s) in this post which you can not view or download

Please register for viewing them.

discrimination_curve.jpg


« Last Edit: August 23, 2009, 06:42:02 pm by homefire »
Logged
Offline foxyrickTopic starter
Pull Tab
*

Join Date: Aug, 2009
Thank you0

Activity
0%
Male
United Kingdom
Posts: 24
Referrals: 0

105.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2009, 03:49:28 am »
Go Up Go Down

Thanks for that Homefire. It does illustrate the differences very clearly. I hadn't realised that we weren't talking about electrical conductivity, but had wondered before why the responses were so different for gold compared to copper and silver.

I don't understand what 'magnetic conductivity' is really; I've been reading up on element's magnetic susceptibilities, permeabilities, diamagnetism and paramagnetisim etc. All I've achieved so far is to recall why I only did the bare minimum on magnetism at university! I can't see any obvious patterns in the properties yet to account for the graphs.

Oh well, I suppose I don't really need to understand the causes as such; it's obtaining the results that matter.

While studying the GS4 design I'm also working on my own ideas, including things like a differential coil arrangement, instrumentation amps on the front end, and fast ADC sampling of the whole (clipped) waveform for feeding into a micro. That way I can look at the width of whole pulse as well as the lower decay characteristics. If I ever get working on the design I'll certainly air it all here; I'll likely need the help!

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg45808.html#msg45808




Logged
Offline MrC
Pull Tab
*

Join Date: Nov, 2009
Thank you0

Activity
0%

United States
Posts: 5
Referrals: 0

20.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2009, 03:53:09 pm »
Go Up Go Down

So just what are we looking at? What's the leading edge?.........The beginning of a sampling period some time after the current to the coil has been shut off?  And the trailing edge is just the end of the sampling period?Huh?Huh???


You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://thunting.com/smf/dlattach.html;topic=7225.0;attach=14607;image


MrC

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg59456.html#msg59456




Logged
Online homefire
Mod
Platin Member
*****

Join Date: Jan, 2009
Thank you2

Activity
100%
Male
United States
Posts: 11452
Referrals: 0

33339.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2009, 06:45:06 pm »
Go Up Go Down

What your looking at is the Decay of the Returned signal out of the receive amp.

Sample start time would be Left most and end of sample would be the Right most.

I robbed that set from another forum.

But he did a good job showing different targets and sample wave forms.



Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg59491.html#msg59491




Logged
Offline ram
Silver Member
*

Join Date: Jul, 2007
Thank you2

Activity
0%

Portugal
Posts: 817
Referrals: 0

5275.00 Gold
View Inventory

Awards
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2009, 06:28:49 am »
Go Up Go Down

i recommend modefied delta pulse, can find small bits of gold. just modify the dp circuit and search coil.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7225.msg60366.html#msg60366




Logged
Print
Pages: 1    Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2005, Simple Machines | Sitemap
Copyright THunting.com