 |  | Quote: |  | | Posted by Alan Hassell | | |  |
| I dont mind constructive posts far from it I would encourage it. Some people confuse the Comet of AD 562 with the eruption of Krakatao which happened in AD 535 and has nothing to do with what happened later. The event of the Comet is a fascinating subject the trouble is there is insufficient evidence that is still out there to be found and in time I believe it will be.
Even locating the evidence of the Cardiff flood is insufficient or conclusive enough to confirm what happened at Camelot but its just another piece of a huge jig saw puzzle that few people have attempted to resolve.
It is also one Academics steer clear of because they value their highly paid positions and know what happened in the case of Velikovsky who was bold enough to speak out. Other academics have attempted to do the same but for fear of reprisals from their masters fail to come forward and make informative posts. If they do come forward it is only to attempt to discredit and rubbish what is already known. Having experienced this in the past I am quick to respond as I take this matter very very seriously as a seeker of the real British History.
| |
| | |
Have you ever seen the tool used for soil sampling.... it is like a long tube, pushed into the soil, which then brings up a core sample.
The trick is not so much to look for Krakatoa ash, which will NOT have any Iridium, but use it as a sign-post, for where to really concentrate looking. The thing to really look for is Iridium, (which will only come from a comet or meteor, and never a volcano!) Iridium is only deposited by meteors, et al, when you find that, an earlier layer, that can be identified, would be nice, then the Iridium can be precisely dated by bracketting.
Iridium is ABSOLUTE proof of an extra terrestrial occurrence, which, by what you are saying, it must have been a Tungusku type occurrence. It would have spread Iridium over a very large area.
If you can get interested parties to do samplings, and a reputable lab to do the element tracing, you will have the indisputable truth. It will not matter what the establishment says, and if the sampling is done on the QT, they will never know, until it is accomplished.
The main thing is, do not editorialize the findings, just present them matter-of-factly. They (the Goombahs) may dispute editorializing, but not "scientific data."
There may be more data that could be gathered, without drawing attention, gather it all, then publish.
YOU may know what happened, and are satisfied with it, but that in its self, is not enough, without provenance, your theories and veracity are in danger, and need to have some anchoring, so-to-speak. King Arthur aside, what you are saying about a comet near miss, is absolutely important and needs to be established in the scientific world, as a fact, if it happened. It could happen again!
There has to be ways to do this. and there may be more than the Iridium. I have seen layers of Iridium (it is white) demonstrated, that were up to 1 1/2 inches thick, some only 1/4 inch, even so, it would not be easy to miss.
I am not suggesting you go out and find the core samples, far from it. It sounds like you could find interested persons, in Wales, with the training to do this and follow up.
Perhaps some non-invasive flux-gate magnetometer surveys? Map several areas, of interest. Add it to the Iridium survey, which could be, ostensibly, looking for Krakatoa dust? Or if Krakatoa surveys have been done, re-examine material for Iridium.
There are more than 100 uses for a dead sheep!
goldigger
Linkback: You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login
http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,9147.msg58596.html#msg58596
|
« Last Edit: November 15, 2009, 04:17:18 am by goldigger »
|
Logged
|
goldigger
|
