Medmaker some items like the Antikythera Mechanism, the Bahgdad batteries, the Piri Reis map, Paulina Zelitski's Megalythic city off Cuba, and a few others point out that we don't know as much about ancient history and technology as we like to think. It's about finding indisputable evidence in strata that can change thought in this direction. Something that Uncle JoeBob found in 1910 and was in the garage for 100 years will never be accepted as evidence, just labeled as anomaly. In science anomalies are thrown out because it screws up theorys and that impinges on grant monies.
RJ paragraphs man, paragraphs
I won't say I agree or disagree on the metaphysical thoughts, not sure this is the right forum for that discussion, simply again say evidence is the key. There has been a lot of real progress on methodology of ancient megalyths. I trust Ed Leedskalnins statement that he knew how the pyramids were built because he built his own mega structure to prove it. Coral Castle is an amazing story. Also check out this guy Wally Wallington moving some huge blocks.
You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCvx5gSnfW4#noexternalembed
Theories are great but they will never change the academic hardliners. Only hard evidence will. Thats why a skull from a 300+ year old undisturbed shipwreck would go a long way to understanding how the skulls were made. Say the new found skull has no tool marks then we have a better idea any with marks were faked. Imagine if that skull found has the same marks? How do you dispute that then? It's not only what you find but how and where you find it and how you document the find that makes it evidence over anomaly.
Find something amazing and a handfull of people will try to prove its real and millions will try to prove its not.
Linkback: You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login
http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,11982.msg86629.html#msg86629
|
|
Logged
|
|