Radar Image Detector! OOOOOO OOOOOO OOOOOO!

		Quote:			Posted by GoldDigger1950
	The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. First hand experience outweighs any amount of theory or conjecture. If you have one and like the use of it, that's what matters. You may want to consider renting it to a few folks in this very thread. Naturally, they need your expertise so you will have to go with it. Do you see merit in that?

Yes there is very much merit in that idea! The t-hunting season is drawing to an end over here due to the onset of the monsoon rains, and unless I get hold of a waterproof detector, effectively I shall be twiddling my thumbs as far as this hobby is concerned. In short, I would rather spend my spare time constructively and if pro bono work is part of it, fine with me

There's bound to be the odd break in rainy weather, so if anyone in Malaysian Borneo would like to see the Nokta Golden King in action, feel free to message me and maybe we can work something out.

1st caveat:
Just don't ask me to dig deep holes like Vourvon did and bury metal for testing the machine...I'm not that hard-working, and would rather expend efforts in working on real targets.
2nd caveat:
If I feel the safety of machine and myself are in doubt, I have no choice but to turn down the inquirer.









Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,4854.msg56337.html#msg56337

		Quote:			Posted by goldigger
	*Herman Goering advocated the concept of truth by repetition.* I never heard that before.... I knew he was very clever.....  I suspect a lot of politicians know and use Goerings thesis! So, does that mean if I continue to object to Nokta, my objections will be recognized as truth (which I already believe they are) ? Your caveats sound workable to me, I do not like deep digging, either.

Of course your objections to the Nokta will be taken to be the truth....by those who choose to believe it, much like you have chosen to believe similar "truths". It's a vicious cycle of 2nd-hand opinions, but for those who take the trouble to see the proper picture, this will not be the case.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,4854.msg56512.html#msg56512

Dear GD1950,
How many REAL GPR you saw in your life works at 12.5Khz?

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,4854.msg56519.html#msg56519

		Quote:			Posted by ronin
	Dear GD1950, How many REAL GPR you saw in your life works at 12.5Khz?

I am not defending GoldDiger1950, but did you know the first aerial radar worked at 11 meters (27 mHz.)?

It is possible to use VLF for radar, but tricky... usually it is sound pressure, not electronic, so called ultrasound, however oilfield seismic search uses ULF/VLF sound waves, also.... and do produce images, very similar to Nokta, NEMFIS and Arc-Geo. Radar is radar is radar, no matter the frequency or method of propagation. (which can be interesting, to be sure.)

One can argue in circles, but what is important is: can it be done, will it weigh less than a Clydesdale, and how many months of pay will it take!!  

goldigger

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,4854.msg56524.html#msg56524

		Quote:			Posted by GoldDigger1950
	Jeepers, Brian, you don't have to be paranoid about it. We both know that radar is a technology, not a frequency dependent function. It's still all right to educate the masses here in spite of recent events. It's even all right to agree with each other. Now, as to your objections about this machine. Would you care to tell me what it is you don't like?

Generally, though, radar is considered as microwaves, by most... I was pointing out that the meaning can be bent like a pretzel!

What I do not like (I would have to re-view the Nokta and I do not want to...) it is snowing like it is not  going to stop,  so I feel lazy! But....

1) It cost TOO much, probably gives the producer a thousand percent profit... 400% is the acceptable limit to greed (if I manufacture something, I want 4 X cost, for a fair price.);
2) It is a bit too heavy, and probably could be redesigned to be much lighter;
3) the makers are TOO secretive;
4) well, that would get into the review area, I do not want to do!

Have you looked at the competing PULS, available in Germany? It too, is too expensive and heavy! If I had a clue of how the imaging was done, to produce a stable image, I might try  to design one and build it... but, they are not letting out any secrets.

Oil exploration uses software to create strata imaging but the software costs more than a Nokta! I could use  the ideas  behind the software to make dozens of images that could be tied to each other, for an over-all image. Can we do it with a PIC?

I have a hunch it is  related to FFT... what think you? Super-dooper, hyper-fast, ATMega- Arduino?

As for recent arguments,  the best way is to ignore it all, there is no point in flogging a dead mule. I believe in *do not get mad, get even.*

Well, it is now 14 inches of snow! Double darn.

goldigger

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,4854.msg56537.html#msg56537