Has Anyone Ever Found Knights of the Golden Circle Treasure?

First GD I was only referring to Napoleon as having made some of the harshness between us and France. I wasn't referring to him towards the Civil War. But I do understand what you are saying by all that. I was just trying to explain to RO that what I was saying refers to realistic things. He blew it out of proportion with that analogue. But I do agree with all your guidelines. And thank you for all that. Many of them are guidelines I already follow but I guess i got distracted with RO's nonsense remarks some of the time.  I'm just trying to explain to him that there is many other possibilities but I wasn't trying to say ones are more right than others. Again though, thank you.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7224.msg72186.html#msg72186

Thank you Christian! Those were the words I was looking for. Sorry i couldn't get that out but thats what I was trying to say.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7224.msg72199.html#msg72199

I'm not certain I agree with that, but I won't argue the point other than to make a simple analogy.  In the northern hemisphere now, people are complaining about how cold it is.  Cold, as a physical measurement, doesn't exist.  Cold is simply an absence of heat.  Remove the heat and you describe it as cold, but cold doesn't exist as a real property in the physical world no matter how much you have to bundle up to avoid it.  The same thing applies when trying to prove that something is false.  False is simply the absence of truth.  It's either true, which can be factually confirmed, or the basis for it's validity is diminished (it's heat removed)  because it can't be proven to be true.  Once you've eliminated all of the possibilities of it being true, by it's very nature the fact that it couldn't be true becomes a truth in itself.  This is the very reason we classify phisical concepts as "laws" or as "theories".  Laws can be proven and cannot be disproven.  Theories cannot be proven, but neither can they be disproven.  False doesn't exist any more that cold does.

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7224.msg72214.html#msg72214

I fully understand Christian, and agree with you more than you think.  A theory will always be a theory until the facts are there to make it a law.  But when we look at if from the perspective of attempting to prove that something didn't happen rather than trying to prove what did happen, the philisophical difference becomes monumental.

Theoretically it's false that a robbery happened, but emperically it's true that it never did happen... see the difference?

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7224.msg72221.html#msg72221

"Many of them are guidelines I already follow but I guess i got distracted with RO's nonsense remarks some of the time."

Nonsense only because a skewed version of real history cannot be validated 

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,7224.msg72233.html#msg72233